A hundred years ago, mankind was already using traditional watches to keep track of time. As there was no electricity back then, the watches was run entirely on mechanical parts based on the concepts of physics and movements. At that point of time, owning a watch is considered a luxury that only a select few could own.
Nowadays, watches are mass produced thanks to improvements and innovation done throughout the years. It’s no longer expensive and almost every people on the street can wear one.
Even then, mechanical or automatic watches still exist despite the influx of new technologies in the form of smartwatches. Automatic watch has a unique character that no other watch can replicate and it is in this attribute that this traditional watch has continued to survive until today.
It is a misconception that automatic watch need to be very expensive and one need to spend thousands of dollars to get a timepiece. In fact, for a budget of just $500, anyone can get a very decent automatic watch!
Here is the 15 Best Automatic Watches Under $500 for you to choose from. Do check out AutomaticWatchesForMen.Com for more detail information about it.
https://automaticwatchesformen.com/best-automatic-watches-under-500
Score from the experts at Killer Infographics
Visual Communication - 65%
Design - 35%
Content/Script - 50%
Usability - 40%
48%
Final Grade
This infographic offers a list of the 15 best men's watches under $500, listing various specifications and features of each model. The text of this infographic is organized with a mostly consistent format, but contains a few grammatical errors. The text also doesn't mention the price of each watch; this is an oversight for an infographic on the topic of best value-for-money in watches. The infographic's layout is also not designed with the viewer's experience in mind. The numbers are organized top-to-bottom in 2 long columns, meaning that as readers scroll downwards, they'll be reading numbers 1 and 9, rather than numbers 1 and 2. The uniformity of the photos and color scheme do create a cohesive visual theme, though. Overall, we'd give this an F.
