Click to Enlarge

Add this Infographic to Your Website:
Simply copy the code below and paste it into the HTML of your blog, website, or Static FBML box on Facebook

<div align="center"><a href="http://www.submitinfographics.com/full-size-infographics/pgachampionship.jpg" target="_blank"><img<br /> src=”http://www.submitinfographics.com/full-size-infographics/pgachampionship.jpg” alt=”infographic” width=”600″><br /> <br /> Click to Enlarge</a><br />Via <a href="http://www.direct-golf.co.uk/"> Direct Golf </a><br />View Other <a href="http://www.submitinfographics.com">Infographics</a></div> <p>

This infographic was submitted by Direct Golf.

I like the texture of this infographic–it feels like a vintage pair of jeans, or maybe golf pants! The background color is nice and reminiscent of a sunny day on the golf course. If only all golf games could take place in the sunshine, right? I love that all of the information is hovering in an enormous sky over a golf course. The golf ball and tee emblem at the top seems to be floating through the air, as though someone might just tee off in mid-air. The information is well divided and organized, so it’s easy to follow.

There are many spelling and grammar errors in this infographic. For example, the first 1916 history fact is a huge run-on sentence. Also “diamond-studded gold metal” should be “gold medal.” (The history section is, in fact, only 2 pieces of information from 1916. I think that could be fleshed out a little more. There’s got to be more history to golf than just 1916 and present day.)

I don’t really understand the “Most Appearances” section–did Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer both have 37 appearances? And why are there arrows from this section down to score cards where neither name appears?

Most problematic is that the only real example of data visualization here is the candles representing each player’s age. Everything else is done in written numbers–things that are attempts at data viz, but are really just design elements. Score cards, numbers written on golf balls, $100 bills, and the like all represent and match what’s being talked about without putting the actual data into a chart, graph, or other tool. Data viz is essential for all infographics, and for this reason and those listed above, I have to give this infographic a D.

Click to Enlarge

Add this Infographic to Your Website:
Simply copy the code below and paste it into the HTML of your blog, website, or Static FBML box on Facebook

<div align="center"><a href="http://www.submitinfographics.com/full-size-infographics/top-trumps-3.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.submitinfographics.com/full-size-infographics/top-trumps-3.gif" alt="infographic" width="665" height="462"><br />Click to Enlarge</a><br /><a href="'http://www.prezzyblog.com" target="_blank">PrezzyBox.com</a><br />View Other <a href="http://www.submitinfographics.com">Infographics</a></div> <p>

The first word that comes to my mind when I see this infographic is “eh.” Not that it’s a bad infographic, it’s just that the title had me expecting one thing and I got another. It’s a very funny concept and the infographic is laid out in an easy to understand way, but the design isn’t that appealing to look at and the infographic only showcases men. I get it, they are ranked by number of sexual partners so women just aren’t making it to the list because (let’s face it) we women just aren’t that slutty. That said, the title is Sex Heroes: Champions of the Bedroom, not World’s Sluttiest Men… so why aren’t any women on here? Only these men are sex heroes? And are they really heroes? I don’t know, it just seems a bit dumb, but wouldn’t be as bad with a far better title.

Here’s what the folks at PrezzyBox.com said about the infographic when submitting it:

Who is the greatest ever lover of all time? Has Warren Beatty slept with more women than Wilt Chamberlain? Who has the greatest porn moustache rating and the obligatory sex tape?

We’ve presented this info in a Top Trumps styel for your perusal in the form of Sex Heroes: Champions of the Bedroom.